It’s almost too easy to define this rooftop extension as a parasitic attachment to the building below. Yet without knowing the function of the metal house, why are we so quick to judge? It could be a restaurant overlooking the skyline of the city; it could be a playground for children to run up and down or house a garden high above the mess in the streets… Would these functions be a one-way exchange of resources? Or do they have something to offer the building?

要定義這屋頂突出物與下方的水泥樓房為一種寄生關係似乎太過於簡單。當無法知道其內在機能時，為何我們要那麼快依外觀下判斷？或許它可以是一座空中餐廳能一望無際的欣賞都市的天際線，或許它是個小朋友遊樂園可爬上爬下的玩耍，或許它是遠離混亂地面層而在空中架設的一個純潔溫室…這些機能會是種單一方向的資源傳導嗎(即為寄生定義)？這些機能對於下面的樓房會有什麼樣的影響？